THE GREAT CONTRADICTION of the MEDICINE (nobody wants to face)

This is a controversial issue that provokes strong reactions and often thoughtless.

We could consider almost like a taboo in our society, because we are faced with one of those "inviolable truths" and commonly accepted that hold the system in place.

And it all starts with a very simple question ...

How to earn a doctor or a pharmacist?

And to answer this question leads us headlong into one of the most absurd paradoxes of today.

It turns out that your doctor or your pharmacist only make money when you're sick.

In fact, the entire industry of medicine and pharmacy earn money from the disease.

At this point, a mind with a minimum capacity of reasoning should ask if the medicine and pharmacy earn money with the disease what interest can have these large industries in which we are healthy?

It is so logical and obvious argument is outrageous and even discouraging anyone wants to accept it as a reality.

To better understand the implications of this reasoning, delve a little more, using the simplest logic.

If we relate the business of medicine and pharmacy with the status of their patients, we see that their profits are settled through 3 basic equations:

SICK = MONEY

HEALTHY = POSSIBLE FUTURE GAIN

DEAD GAIN = NULL

That draw 2 outlines basic business:

In the first A-money earned by the cyclical alternation Sano-diseased state of patients. A greater frequency in the occurrence of the "sick" greater opportunities for cyclical income.

B-In the second, more optimal, money is earned by continued disease over time, ie, chronic disease.

In both cases, it is essential to provide adequate quality of life for the patient to continue defraying the treatment and foremost, avoid or postpone death, as this would mean the end of the income.

It is clear therefore that full health, in no way implies earnings.

Instead, the disease always guaranteed.

We know this is a striking argument, but more laps we give, is the truth.

Maybe we should stop qualifying medicine and pharmacy as "health sciences" and start calling them "science of disease", right?

Obviously, we are not saying that doctors are not interested in the health of their patients or that promote the spread of disease.

Physicians, as people and as professionals want the best for their patients and apply all his knowledge from the education received in restoring health to the sick.

But the key lies precisely here. In the education received by physicians. That is, in how they are transmitted to them knowledge.

Because the truth is that from accessing medical school are trained and educated to become part of the medical-pharmaceutical industry and adapt to their logical operation, in the same way that a soldier is trained and educated to join an army and adapt to its logical operation.

Following the same logic, the pharmaceutical industry earns huge amounts of money from the disease, in the same way that the arms industry earn huge amounts of money from the war.

And reaching here, would not be very naive to think that the pharmaceutical industry promotes health? Or is it perhaps someone imagines a weapons manufacturer promoting peace in the world?

As we see, the relationship and the influence of the arms industry over the military world is similar to that exerted by the pharmaceutical industry on the world of medicine. Both industries instrumentalized to those who "use their products" in the exercise of their professional performance.

It is crazy to think that they will use part of its immense economic power to influence education and programming of doctors and pharmacists, who tomorrow will continue to ensure that the business plan continues.

So it stands to reason that all knowledge on medicine and pharmacy is geared to suit the business logic "disease = money".

No doubt there will be readers who will be pulling your hair out of your head.

For one thing, accept this reality collides with their more deeply held views.

It would be tantamount to admitting that science can be perverted by love of money. Unthinkable in the innocent minds of many people, who believe that the world of science is something pure and unharmed, populated by wise and upright men as angels dressed in white robes, put his intellect at the service of human welfare selflessly.

To these people, we should remind you that ALL the world's weapons, both conventional and mass destruction have been created by scientists. All environmental disasters from oil spills to chemical or radioactive contamination, would have been impossible without the direct involvement of the scientific world, serving the most unbridled greed.

The world of science is not made up of superior beings, but for normal people, so corrupt, greedy and unconscious as it can be any other human collective.

But let us focus again in the world of medicine and the perverse logic "disease = money" and arguments can be advanced against this statement.

No doubt there will be many people who claim that "the disease is inherent to human life and nature and that the activity of medicine consists precisely in fighting the disease"

That is, they conclude that the role of the medical and pharmaceutical industries is fighting disease and therefore a logical and natural, the inevitable onset of illness brings benefits to both industries, without them having to blame for it .

But is it possible that medicine and pharmacy focus their efforts and your business in health and not disease?

Let's reason it out.

For this model was feasible, the doctor should only make money while the patient was healthy.

And stop win while he was sick.

The 3 above equations medical-pharmaceutical business would become the following:

SICK GAIN = NULL

HEALTHY = MONEY

DEAD GAIN = NULL

Thus, the physician focus their efforts on their patients maintain health all the time, preventing disease before it appeared and therefore studying and addressing its causes and not its consequences.

And if the patient fell ill, the doctor would endeavor to return as soon as possible to its healthy state, to earn money back with him and keep their professional standing.

The role of the pharmacist would be complementary and would basically provide those products needed to strengthen and prolong the patient's health, and if, necessary to combat the disease when it appeared.

As we can see, according to this model, the pharmacist would be more related to the world of nutrition with chemistry.

This form of work, a lot of people may seem fanciful, and worked previously.

Recall that in ancient China, doctors were paid a salary to keep their patients healthy and stopped when they perceive sick, made a negative impact on their professional prestige and therefore in profits.

Do you think, then, an absurd model?

Need more absurd than a medical-pharmaceutical industry that makes money only when you're sick?

Obviously, as it is structured today's society, this model is very difficult to apply, despite being much more logical and potentially beneficial to the patient.

When they arrived here, perhaps we should ask: why since its inception medicine opted for a model in which the gain is associated with the disease, not health?

And the answer can not be sadder: everything revolves around power.

The disease is an exceptional period of crisis in the life of a person, in which the sick, desperate, is willing to give or pay whatever it takes to save his life and the physician stands as the only figure capable I get it.

That is why medicine focuses on the disease, because it is the critical situation involves grabbing more power and authority flowing from the patient to the doctor.

We have seen throughout history, where even kings and emperors have bowed to their doctors.

However, if the medicine focus its efforts on maintaining the health of the patient, the crisis associated with the disease run against the doctor, because during it lost social prestige and desaprovecharía that unique opportunity in which the patient is willing to give more money, power and authority to your doctor.

Therefore, medicine has not evolved around the concept of health; It has done about authority and social prestige.

And profit they entail.

And these benefits can only be obtained through the disease.

A completely opposite operation than it should be.

This is the great contradiction of medicine.

It is based on simple mechanisms so that anyone can understand.

However, despite of having it in front of our noses, the world is closing its eyes to this reality so obvious.

And the world is not full of blind, but people who do not want to open my eyes ...

VIA:GAZZETTA THE APOCALYPSE