GAZZETA OF APOCALYPSE: THE TRUTH ABOUT THE ECONOMY

Most of us do not even notice.

But we are immersed in two different realities simultaneously.

Our body lives in the real and tangible world, subject to the laws of nature, while our mind remains immersed in abstract fictions with which it has been programmed to the point of creating a parallel reality dominated by a set of laws and logic imaginary.

A paradigmatic example of this and we have already mentioned several times be a visual and didactic example, is money itself.

A ticket is just a piece of paper.

If that role acquires a certain monetary value and is considered "money" is because we, by social convention, have decided so within our minds.

When performing this maneuver of abstraction, create, out of nowhere, an augmented reality to superimpose on the physical reality.

In the real and tangible world, the ticket is only and always will be, a piece of paper with beautiful and colorful graphics. However, in the parallel reality of fiction that program our minds, that ticket is considered "money" and in many cases get to kill for it.

Beyond the typical example of the ticket, the fact is that the economy as a whole, has become the most obvious example of how our abstract creations, empty of real value, have taken over our minds and have gone completely our lives .

In today's economy, big business are not based in the production or manufacture of real and tangible products but on speculation, dominated by the financial world, the sector of the economy that produces nothing tangible precisely nor useful.

The financial environment is a fantasy world where imaginary products derived from other imaginary products and governed by complex abstract laws, which earn obscene amounts of "money", an imaginary entity whose value lies only in our mind are created.

As we see, the current economy represents the pinnacle of abstract onanism in which humans live submerged.

Imagine a farmer who has dairy cows.

That milk has real value and an associated abstract value.

Its real value lies in its nutritional value in food representing and physical benefits it provides.

His abstract value lies in the monetary value we each liter of milk, something that exists only in our psyche.

Well, in today's world, the bulk of economic gains relative to that found in milk derived abstract values of the monetary value of that milk.

A cow produces one liter of milk is sold to a dairy company, which in turn is part of a financial conglomerate in the field of food. Such large publicly traded company and the value of their shares fluctuates daily; once in bag, large financial institutions engage in betting on the future value of the shares of that company, buying and selling these estimates of future value, which in turn are subject to fluctuations in interest rates on whose future value place new bets and estimates that are bought and sold, etc, etc, etc ...

So basically works the world of financial derivatives.

That means that a farmer earns a measly cents for a liter of milk and nutritious food, but derived from the real and tangible product, thousands of euros based on abstractions void that exist only in the mind of the speculators are generated.

A virtual reality just seriously affecting the operation of the real world, it can end up ruining the farmer with a simple mouse click or a mere dance of digits on a screen.

A fictional world where some people earn huge amounts of money without doing anything useful or productive and yet, the company believes some winners.

People and sterile entities that accumulate profits by buying and selling literally digits on a screen, zeros and ones that exist only in the cold womb of a computer.

This is the current economy: a huge orgy of abstract values and imaginary conventions that exist only in our minds; the logical result of slavery to which we have had our own mental creations.

Something that should not be and that more laps we give, it makes no sense, even libraries that can fill explaining how this complex system works and more we insist on calling "economic science".

Because at the end of the day, a farmer produces milk, which is something real and tangible.

The milk and dairy feed people who are real and tangible beings.

Even cow manure is used to produce compost, which is something useful, real and tangible.

And the fertilizer used to grow vegetables, real and tangible things that feed both people and cows themselves, producing meat, milk and manure.

When they arrived here, we must ask: how can it be that in our world have less value manure from a cow that an "option on futures" when manure has profound implications for our survival, while "option futures "is a simple abstract invention that does not bring us anything tangible?

Maybe it's time to call a spade a spade: the cow poop has more value and usefulness entire financial world as a whole.

Because without manure no nitrates, fertilizer, plants would not grow and just plant or animal life on the planet.

Not only would life for these pseudo-human robots that fill the bags and that abound in the bustling offices of financial institutions.

No "shopping options for the future", "credit default swaps", "stock indices" or "risk premium" equal the world continue to exist, plants continue to grow and proliferate animals and life under the sunlight and the blue sky.

For all these financial instruments are nothing, are just inventions, abstract fictions that only serve to billions of people around the world suffer a life of slavery, while some other, sitting opposite to the screen of a computer without doing anything productive nor beneficial to others, accumulate huge amounts of imaginary digits in their current accounts.

Those are the bitter fruit that gives us the "abstract economy". We call it that because it is an economic system that has grown to service, no tangible and actual values, but from the very abstract tools that once created man to make them an useful exchange.

They at this point, will soon outraged economists argue that these are simplistic reasoning appear.

That without the development of economic science, one that studies the functioning of the "abstract economy" would not have reached the heights of current progress, which have enabled us population growth and technological advances we enjoy.

They say that without today's complex financial instruments not flow money or credit, what pompously describe as "the lifeblood of the economy" ...

And they will be right, absolutely right.

But really what they want to tell us is that without economic science, all we would not be slaves from cradle to grave, condemned to fight a lifetime to accumulate pieces of paper with which to buy thousands of items and products that do not need .

Without the "abstract economy" based on purely fictitious entities, the real value of things serious intrinsic monetary value rather abstract value that has made all things in the world have a price, including people, to the point to become bought, sold and treated as mere pieces of paper.

Without the development of economics and "abstract economy", perhaps we would never have come to Mars, a true milestone for our species, but neither should address the deep shame that involves the act of sending artifacts to other planets as we are unable to solve the serious problems we generate our own.

Without the "abstract economy" would throw away each year thousands of tons of food out to not lower your price, while millions of people around the world are hungry.

Without the "abstract economy" there would be thousands of families homeless and homeless while empty houses are falling apart because no one lives.

Without the "abstract economy" make weapons to kill millions of people would not be the most lucrative business in the world.

Without the "abstract economy" would not need bankers, economists, analysts, financial advisors, brokers, brokers, finance ministers and finance, inspectors, rating agencies, or rating agencies and obviously as we all know now, without all them this planet would be uninhabitable and sad place, a dreadful wilderness, they all give us so much happiness, both being, many advances and so much progress, and are as useful and productive for humanity, that we can not only be conceived as end the planet without him ...

Even in his infinite arrogance and inability to imagine alternative worlds, these people even claim that without the "abstract economy" humans would not have reached such heights of civilization and progress and that "the world would not advance".

Because obviously, without economic and financial structures ...

Had creativity in the world? Was there the initiative? Does the inventive? The Talent? The Art? Does the spirit of exploration and adventure? Does the competitiveness and the ability to overcome?

We might even get to ask for more negative human aspects.

Without economic and financial structures ...

Would there be the need for domination over others? Is the pride? Is the ambition? Does the self-centeredness?

All those things are part of human nature or that perhaps invented this bunch of parasites?

Do not let that mislead us.

The economy and all economic structures are only abstract instruments that should serve people as are the mathematical or linguistic structure we create, and not vice versa, as now.

Because whatever they say these armies of little men in ties and slicked though we flooded with information that they continually invent, the only truth, the real tangible reality is that cow poop still more real value than the financial world together.

GAZZETTA THE APOCALYPSE

Additional Comments:

Many people may make the mistake of thinking that the big financial, those people who are actually controlling the world, are obsessed with accumulating money and therefore are the first victims of these imaginary structures that dominate us.

It is certainly possible that in the middle and lower strata of the ladder of economic power is so.

But the great financiers, who occupy the highest positions of the pyramid of power, not struggling to accumulate money.

Let no one deceive you more about it.

Most of these people are not idiots about unconscious: can distinguish very well what has real value and having a dummy value.

For them, money and finance world in general, is the instrument used to take tangible natural resources, ie that which has real value on earth.

Therefore, if we fight them, we should not focus exclusively on banks and wrest control of the money, but focus our efforts on snatch mines, land, plantations, water and gas company and oilfields.

Heading for control of the future is at stake here: nothing will accumulate bitcoines if they continue to possess the actual physical resources; nothing will build our own devices with 3d printers at home if they actually provide us the plastics, graphene and electricity ...