If everyone reading this gave $5, we could end our Children Homeless Fundation right now.
Make Money Strategy Guide FREE!!.. Not a Scam!!
Thursday, April 2, 2015
HANDLING OF THE MEDIA IN THE ATTACKS OF PARIS
It was the big news this start of 2015: the brutal terrorist attack against the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo.
We are not facing an event either: already being felt the first effects
of this devastating attack, in the form of public petitions for mass
control, citizen complaint suspicious attitude and police and military
presence in the streets in order to ensure the safety alleged citizen; and this we must add the first throes of growing social and religious division, whose effects can end up suffering all.
A new twist to strangle our rights and freedoms.
But in this particular article we will focus on analyzing the suspected
role of mass media in all matters relating to these attacks, something
that many alternative internet media have echoed.
Accompanying and complementing this article, we have written another entitled COLLECTION OF SUSPECTS ASPECTS IN THE ATTACKS OF PARIS
, where we met many of the contradictory information media mass conceal
the matter or have gone unnoticed for most of the people.
THE ROLE OF MEDIA IN THE ATTACKS OF PARIS
CONFUSION IN THE MEDIA IN THE EARLY HOURS AFTER THE ATTACK
Is beginning to be a classic as suspect after each terrorist attack,
the mass media, allegedly responsible for informing the public, do not
give foot with ball when narrating what is happening.
Hoaxes and misinterpretations occur and that leads us to ask: what good
really spend four years in college studying journalism career?
It also begs the question: where do they come so many confusing news and so many hoaxes?
To begin remember that the first reports spoke of an attack by three
attackers, then forget the third assailant end up talking for hours and
only two terrorists: the Kouachi brothers.
In the end, the media has made us talk about three terrorists in total,
but as we shall see has become a confused and the matter has left a
series of extremely suspicious information gaps, as we will show later.
To begin, let's focus on the news offered by the media during the first hours, full of contradictions and misunderstandings.
For example, the night of Wednesday January 7 to January 8, several
Spanish radio announced that the terrorists had been cornered in an
apartment in Reims and they were surrounded by police.
The terrorist bombing of Charlie Hebdo, cornered in the city of Reims
The French newspaper Le Point anticipates an exclusive in which notes
that the French police prepare an imminent operation in the city of
Reims northeast of Paris "
The news, as we had presented some means disappeared and reproduced the
next day, saying that this time had been herded into another home in
Oise.
"The
Kuachi Said Cherif and brothers were seen this morning at a gas station
near the town of Villers-Cotterets, in Aisne, which would have stolen
fuel and food.Subsequently,
the chain Picardie France 3 reported that they had abandoned their
vehicle, a gray Clio, and had barricaded themselves in a house in the
town of Crépy-en-Valois, in Oise.
However, this information has not been confirmed and even the mayor of
the town, Bruno Fortier, has told Reuters that helicopters were flying
over the town and had been deployed police and anti-terrorist forces.
"It's an endless waltz of police cars and trucks," he told Reuters the
mayor, who said he could not confirm the information on the presence of
the suspects in a house in the area.
Several French media reports of a heavy police presence in another town of Aisne.
According to Le Figaro, has cut a local road to the town of Longpont
and would be making records in several homes in the nearby town of Corcy
"
Finally, after these two previous or rather, bad and hasty
interpretations of facts false rumors, the brothers themselves were
rounded; this time in a print shop in the town of Dammartin-en-Gode, following the same pattern characterized news headline "2 suspects rounded up by the police" who had repeated to above.
Meanwhile, US media senior, also contributed to the confusion.
An example of the level of confidence we should have all to the
information provided by the mass media is found in the following article
published by a chain of American prestige, nothing more and nothing
less than NBC.
This is what I came to say NBC on January 7:
"NEWSFLASH:
one of the suspects in the attack of Paris has been killed and two
others have been arrested, officials of the United States"
Zerohedge As the site says:
"How this false rumor spread, becoming featured in a newscast certain prestige?
According to NBC, "This morning, two senior US counterterrorism
officials told NBC News that one of the suspects in the attack had died
and two others were in custody. However, officials said later that the information could not be confirmed "
It is somewhat curious that the mainstream media, led by "the best
communications professionals characterized by their credibility," do not
stop making mistakes and inaccuracies and again, some of them very
serious, no one would take in face or being accused of "contributing to
confusion or chaos."
However, any alternative means of Internet is qualified forger or
conspiranoico for much less, with the difference that the alternative
media do not receive government assistance or succulents are considered
the "universal bearers of truth".
ACCUSED OF ATTACK THE ALLEGED BROTHER IN LAW WITHOUT PROOF OF IT
"Efficient" French security services and obedient spokesmen for the
media had no qualms about publicly accuse the attack on a person who had
no relation to the facts, in the early hours ...
"Another man who at first was identified as another possible major perpetrators of the attack was delivered tonight.It is Mourda Hamyd, who came to 23.00 to the police station in Charleville-Mezieres, near the border with Belgium.Hamyd, 18, appeared voluntarily after seeing its circular on social networks name.To the agents, the young has proclaimed his innocence, which raises questions about their real involvement in the crimes.So far, no charges have been filed against him.
A fellow Hamyd has told the media that the young Gauls was not in Paris
at the time of the attack because she was with him at the high school
of Reims, where he enrolled last year. "He's like the other fellow, friendly and not at all violent. He is someone you can talk and joke, "said the student on condition of anonymity.
According to the newspaper 'Libération', the Mourda own Kouachi Chérif Saïd and be part of an organized command. In this line, Manuel Valls said that "services (secrets) were known and therefore followed them".
'Le Monde' goes further and says that it is a "family" cell, since
Mourad has the same name as the woman Cherif, suggesting that family
ties among the three "
Here we must ask yourself some questions: whether as indicated by the
media and the authorities, Mourda Hamyd was a dangerous Islamic
terrorist who was part of a "family unit" ... why he voluntarily
surrendered to the police? That's typical of a dangerous Islamist terrorist?
Not an act of irresponsibility on the part of the media and the
authorities accuse someone of something so extremely grave without
conclusive evidence of this?
Can we tolerate the media act so irresponsibly?
Can anyone imagine what would have happened to Mourda Hamyd if afraid
to be accused by the media, had made the mistake of trying to escape?
And if he had been killed by the police in their flight, Anybody can
imagine what we would have said the media themselves about it?
Do we would have said he was innocent and it was all a mistake or have
argued that the attacks had helped even without evidence of this and
that's why he fled?
We leave the answer to imagination of readers.
But as we shall see, the issue of Mourda Hamyd could have been one of
the aspects that have most influenced when creating confusion to the
point of leaving several questions in the air ...
THE GREAT MYSTERY HOW MANY MEN ATTACKED THE EDITOR OF THE JOURNAL Charlie Hebdo?
This is undoubtedly one of the most confusing aspects of the attacks in Paris, although no one speaks it.
This confusion is due mainly to the lack of specificity of the information provided by the media.
The key question is how many men attacked the offices of Charlie Hebdo? Were were two or three?
As we've seen published in the media, were initially three men and with
the passing of time, one of them "volatilized" ending up being just two
assailants.
Here are a set of news excerpts chosen at random from internet, which
clearly reflect the level of confusion and contradiction which can fall
mainstream media ...
France: attacking shots headquarters of the weekly "Charlie Hebdo" and there are 12 dead
Three masked men broke on Wednesday at the offices of Charlie Hebdo, killing a dozen people before fleeing, police and witnesses.
At least two of the three authors
of the attack penetrated shot at midmorning in drafting the satirical
weekly Charlie Hebdo progressive and killed at close range to 12 people,
mostly members of the editorial ...
The three suspects identified by police last night are Said K. and K. Cherif, brothers of 34 and 32 years respectively, and Hamyd M., 18. The three men are French nationals.
(Once ruled Hamyd, the third suspect is volatilized and NOBODY SAYS NOTHING)
The slaughter occurred at noon in the eleventh arrondissement, when two masked men dressed in black, have entered the offices of the magazine armed with Kalashnikov rifles and have fired staff.According to the government, the police are looking for a total of "three criminals" across the capital.
Police finishes with the two terrorists who attacked the magazine Charlie Hebdo
Kouachi The two brothers suspected of the attack, had entrenched
themselves in the press this morning north of Paris with at least one
hostage, who has unhurt.
Several rounds of automatic gunfire, accompanied by loud explosions
have occurred shortly before 17:00 at the press of a town northeast of
Paris where were entrenched since this morning the two perpetrators of the attack on the headquarters Charlie Hebdo, who died in the assault.
The French Interior Minister reported being actively seeking "three criminals" responsible for the attack.The Paris prosecutor has clarified that the perpetrators of the attack are two, although one witness claims to have seen three men leave the car in which they had absconded.
In fact, the newspaper El Mundo comes to contradict information in one
piece, as is the case of one of the computer graphics used to narrate
the evolution of events.
54 hours of panic in Paris Updated: 01/10/2015 14:14 pm
Two masked men entered the headquarters of 'Charlie Hebdo' weekly cartoons of Muhammad, and shot at close range against journalists.
On Wednesday two terrorists attacked the wording of the French satirical Charlie hebdo leaving 12 dead.
(In the infographic of the World, then we can read the following)
12:15 (Thursday): In the rue de Meaux, shortly before the door Pantin, French police lost track of three individuals allegedly responsible for the attack. One, Cherif Kouachi is a jihadist well known in France.
January 7, 2015.- Three gunmen
attacked the editor of the magazine "Charlie Hebdo" which had published
cartoons about Muhammad, and killing 12 people, including the director
of the publication
Attack on freedom of expression in France. Two gunmen
have attacked the headquarters of the French satirical weekly Charlie
Hebdo in Paris, causing several deaths and giving then fled in a vehicle
with the help of a third suspect.
Three gunmen have attacked the French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo and killed eleven people.
Three hooded men armed with Kalashnikov rifles have fired the writing of this publication, which in the past received threats for publishing illustrations critical Muhammad.
The three days of terror began on Wednesday when a pair of masked men broke into the offices of the weekly, killing 12 people.
On Thursday, another gunman killed a police outside the country and on Friday agreed actions from all attackers.
With the brothers Charlie Hebdo attacked entrenched in a print shop
near the Charles de Gaulle airport, the third gunman began a hostage
crisis inside a kosher supermarket.
As we can see behind this random collection of various media, we can not clarify exactly how many attackers were.
How many assailants were Charlie Hebdo? Two? Three?
Here, the middle of the confusion, when the figure appears Amedy
Coulibaly, contributing even further, to generate misinformation ...
THE EMERGENCE OF Amedy COULIBALY
The subsequent emergence of a third terrorist allegedly coordinated
with the two Kouachi, Amedy Coulibaly brothers, further contributes to
the confusion.
Supposedly, Coulibaly was responsible for the murder of an officer of
the municipal police on Wednesday January 7, hours after the attack on
Charlie Hebdo and then kidnapped a Jewish supermarket.
But we can guess at the following chronic, did not participate in the attack on Charlie Hebdo ...
The brothers were Kouachi Al Qaida, his accomplice Coulibaly was the Islamic State
The author of the kidnapping of Jewish Store acknowledged being linked to the perpetrators of the slaughter in 'Charlie Hebdo'
Amedy Coulibaly, the abductor of Jewish food store in Paris, is the
author of the death of one agent Municipal Police on Thursday and is, in
turn, accomplice of the Kouachi brothers, responsible for the massacre
of the satirical weekly "Charlie Hebdo ".
Yesterday
appeared on social networks video from Amedy Coulibaly, the attacker
Jewish super that killed a policeman and four hostages, which proclaimed
their loyalty to the leader of the Islamic State.He says he and Said and Cherif Kouachi brothers formed a "team" that were synchronized."They were in charge of the weekly 'Charlie Hebdo' and police.We have made a little apart, to have more impact things a little together, "he says.
Coulibaly said in a posthumous video that his attack was aimed at "more impact"
The terrorist kosher supermarket said to belong to the Islamic State and have coordinated their action with Kouachi
Paris.
(EFE) .- A man claiming to be Amedy Coulibaly claimed the murder of a
local police on Thursday in Paris on behalf of the Islamic State and
claims to have coordinated their actions with Kouachi brothers to have
"more impact" in a video released today on the internet.
According to the man who identifies as Coulibaly, he and Said and
Cherif Kouachi brothers formed a "team" that was synchronized to launch
the attacks. "They were in charge of the weekly Charlie Hebdo and police. We have made a little apart, to have more impact things a little together, "he says.
As we see, the media, without explicitly specify, separated Coulibaly shares of shares of Kouachi brothers.
According to the media, Kouachi raided the home of Charlie Hebdo and
Coulibaly killed a police agent kidnapped in Montrouge and Kosher
supermarket, separately.
They coordinated their actions temporarily to cause greater impact, but
were not together, because not only obeyed the orders of the same
organizations.
We have since learned two things about Coulibaly.
1- He met with Sarkozy:
"Amedi
Coulibaly, The Alleged perpetrator of the death yesterday of a police
force in Montrouge and was killed Friday in a Jewish shop in Paris,
after the assault to the police, met in 2009 With Nicolas Sarkozy. It
was a then a Meeting with President With several young temporary
Contracts, in order to be interested in the working conditions of French
employees.
One
at that time, Coulibaly was shown overwhelmed at the Meeting with
Sarkozy in an interview published in the newspaper "Le Parisien". "It's a pleasure. I do not know what can I say ... I'll start with a "good morning "" commented "
2- The French security services Knew Their terrorist links
Coulibaly
was Sentenced in December 2013 to five years in prison for trying to
help him escape the Islamist Smaïn Ait Belkacem, a former member of the
Armed Islamic Group (GIA) Algerian WHO carried interest out an attack on
the train the Musée d'Orsay in Paris in 1995, with 30 wounded.
But curiously, esta Known and dangerous terrorist, Convicted and
monitored by the security services HAD During three days time to do
Everything That flesh pleased.
After
the attack Kouachi brothers Charlie Hebdo, a municipal agent killed in
Montrouge, managed to flee the scene, Went home and HAD time to record a
video (changing clothes up to 4 times), Which established STI
coordination Where reivindaba With them and what " was going to do ",
ie, kidnap Jewish supermarket Where I Allegedly killed four people. Then I left His house, armed to the teeth and quietly Went to the supermarket to make a kidnapping.
Menudos intelligence, right?
And MOST That is always suspicious, in Original terrorists, leaving
Numerous previous trail in networks and in the media world, as was the
case with man Haron Monis, the kidnapper Sidney Coffee ...
CONCLUSION ON THE three assailants
The finding arrived midst of so much confusion and vagueness media Is That a terrorist is gone .
The question is: WHERE IS THE THIRD MUGGER A Charlie Hebdo JOURNAL OF TALKING SOME LIGHTS?
WHY NOBODY TALKS ABOUT IT?
WHY YOU HAVE FORGOTTEN THE MEDIA?
HAVE YOU volatilized?
It Seems That the confusion lies in the following respec ...
Initially 3 people accused of the attack on Charlie Hebdo magazine:
Kouachi the two brothers and the alleged brother of one of them, Mourda
Hamyd. Some witnesses corroborate that actually "saw 3 people."
That should be the starting point.
But to voluntarily surrender Mourda Hamyd a curator of northern France
and prove his innocence by removing the initial theory according to
which part of the group of three attackers, the figure of the third
suspect disappears from the scene, as if it never existed, even though
hours before, witnesses and media themselves speak of him.
That's when the media start talking about "two attackers Charlie Hebdo"
Later, after the appropriate video of claim Coulibaly, the media claim
that the brothers and Coulibaly were "complicit" and acted "coordinated"
without specifying in any way how or why.
Thus, in the public mind, is covered "vacancy" the third suspect seen
in the assault on the headquarters of Charlie Hebdo, which people
unconsciously identified as Coulibaly, despite the very means of
communication, diffuse and nothing clear, separate actions Coulibaly of
the Kouachi brothers.
As always, a fantastic role of mass media, as we see, only serve to
confuse, throw messages parroting propaganda and information from our
partners and governments without contrasting.
Agents pure disinformation.
That's what they call "journalism".
THE LIE OF POLICE INSISTENT EXECUTED WITH A SHOT IN THE HEAD
A clear example of the ability to confuse and misinform the media we
have in the most infamous and shocking image of this attack, used to
highlight the brutality of terrorists: the cold-blooded execution of
Police Ahmed Merabet.
Insistently, the official media have insisted that the police was being
run shot in the head, a claim that has caused a huge controversy in
some alternative media, reaching raise doubts about the possibility that
we to find a false dramatization of an execution.
The main focus of confusion stems from the statement "executed with a shot to the head."
As we can see in the video below, this statement does not seem too
sustainable, because according to many experts, shot in the head with an
AK-47, would have caused the victim's head literally exploded.
An example of the damage caused by an AK-47 can see in the video below:
On the other hand, in the video content on the web following, offered
the image (not for sensitive souls) of execution in slow motion, show us
what (supposedly and according to some alternative media) would be a
shot deliberately failed, which could be inferred by bouncing the ball
on the sidewalk:
However, one can not argue categorically that all this question of an assembly.
There is the possibility that the victim was actually executed, but
without being shot in the head, as stated by the middle Daily Sheeple:
"That's not a head shot!The bullet entered the bulletproof vest at the top of the shoulder to walk out the front.The small dust explosion we see is the steel core ammunition hitting the sidewalk.Blood spills caused by injury, would be contained by the body armor at the front.What is indisputable is that there has not been a headshot.A bullet from 126 grams to 700 meters per second, if hit in the head, would have exploded like a melon "
Obviously, we are not experts in ballistics or weapons (or expect to
have to be), but at this point do not need to have much knowledge of the
subject to see, quite clearly, that the victim was shot in the head; otherwise, the images are much tougher.
The big question is: if lots of people have been able to deduce
something as obvious as this, why does the media continue to insist that
he was executed with a bullet in his head? Did journalists can not minimally investigated before as inaccurate statements? Why should we believe them if they do not even care to tell the truth about something so obvious?
THE NEW ROLE OF MEDIA IN THE ACTS OF TERRORISM
One issue that is most striking about the attack of Paris, is the new role of the media.
Not only do we offer live terrorist attacks as if it were a spectacle
more, they are now able to interview the terrorists themselves while
doing the attacks, further contributing to convert the attacks in a
great TV show.
As stated in The World:
"We synchronize operations".This
forceful the kidnapper Amedy Coulibaly said while retaining several
hostages today Hyper Cacher, a Jewish supermarket in Paris.Before
being killed by police during the assault on kosher food store where
entrenched, Coulibaly called the French television BFMTV to make his
intentions clear.
BFMTV also spoke this morning with one of the attackers 'Charlie Hebdo'
Kouachi Cherif, who remained ensconced in an industrial building in
Dammartin-en-Goële.
He said he and his brother "were the defenders of the Prophet" and was
"under the command of Al Qaeda in Yemen", where he had traveled to
receive training.
As explained from this medium have been Cherif Kouachi who answered the
phone when an editor called chain directly to the printer in which
jihadists remained entrenched. "We were trying to find a witness," explained an editor of BFMTV. Apparently there were two calls, the second of which was recorded by television and sent to the police
This fact opens a new path in the field of television broadcasting.
Probably from now, we can "enjoy" dramatic live calls during the
attacks, thereby increasing the level of spectacle and morbidity of the
events described.
A new route for the media with propaganda to offer doses to the
population and increase the dose of emotional impact, show and morbidity
of any tragedy or violent act in the future is as open.
And with it, the ability to manipulate the emotions of the people at the whim of the writers of the system.
AN EXAMPLE OF SUBTLE SOCIAL CONDITIONING
Before closing, we want to add one more detail that speaks very
clearly, the level of manipulation to which we are subject, especially
from the media.
Everything revolves around the use of mobile and detail that may seem merely anecdotal.
And, apparently, Amedy Coulibaly, 32 years old, it tasted like a mobile phone is switched off.
It seems that Coulibaly is the only person of his age who can not turn off the phone.
The media has told us that after calling the television, Coulibaly
"hung wrong mobile phone" and still could hear what was happening inside
the supermarket.
That was how the police could know the movements of Coulibaly and found the best time for the assault.
Similarly, hidden in a cardboard box worker could tell the police
movements Kouachi brothers in the press in which they had dug, giving
valuable information to the security forces for the assault.
In both cases, the technology combines the side of "good" and the fact offers two subliminal images of "high value".
The first subliminal message is: policing, listening to what happened
on the other side of the phone, saves lives, as in the case of Coulibaly
and assault the Jewish supermarket.
The second subliminal message is: someone sneaking goat movements
"evil", helps to stop them, as in the case of hiding in the box printing
worker.
Put another way, very subtle inoculated two concepts in the popular
imagination taking advantage of a moment of great emotional charge:
1- The police control of communications is positive
2- The denunciation and citizen complaints are positive
And what happened the next day?
The Spanish government has begun to consider strengthening the
mechanisms that allow teachers, doctors or social workers betray any
hint of activity that could be considered "radical and violent".
"Putting
civil society to work, dip their teachers, social workers and even
doctors to detect signs of radicalism among Muslims among 1.2 and 1.5
million, from an estimated resident in Spain.Then we'll have to disable and close the sources from which young aspiring jihadists feed.
The attacks in Paris have prompted the Spanish Ministry of Interior to
dust the National Plan to Combat Violent Radicalization in the Islamic
fund, which began work two years ago and whose forthcoming adoption
announced seven months ago, in Brussels, Secretary of State for
Security, Francisco Martínez. Now, will be adopted soon by the Council of Ministers, as predicted Minister Jorge Fernandez Diaz. "It is the time for action", said yesterday in Paris "
This, so far, only affects the Islamist radicals, but once established
the concept and created mechanisms, and can imagine that with the
passage of time may be extended to other annoying and "potentially
violent" groups, such as anarchists or anti-system in general ... a
definition that could ultimately prove very broad and diffuse. People
The funny thing That is the main abitur to report Such activities will
be mainly With Public Officials Whose job and Their livelihood depends
THEREFORE Directly from the Authorities.
What will happen if any of These Officials refuse to exercise informer?
If one day a young jihadist Man Who goes to school, for instance, Makes
an attack and Their teachers or social services did not detect Their
activities, Can They Fall acerca them Suspicions That did not Fulfill
Their obligation or collaborated Directly With Him default?
Eventually Perhaps it can not make a big pressure for groups in
Original, That conditional on overact, denouncing suspicious activity
more real?
Do you begin to see the level of public paranoia That can lead us all
this and the serious it May Have Consequences for our freedoms?
CONCLUSION
After all this show of confusion, conflicting reports, half-truths,
omissions Timely and Widespread manipulation, it really Becomes
Difficult To have any confidence in the information provided by the mass
media.
It is possible That With The passing hours or days, some of the Contradictions of the Means shown in artículo are clarified.
It is a possibility.
But what no one can argue it's the blatant failure of mainstream media telling the truth When Cleary and reliably.
The only way to keep trusting in them, is to close our eyes to the
evidence and ignore Their constant inconsistencies and falsehoods ...
Why MOST people still refuse to see something so obvious?
Are you going to continue believing the lies that you 'Told in the mass media, on television, in newspapers or large radio?
The Consequences of These CAN HAVE attacks on the lives of Thousands,
if not millions of people can be extremely serious and everything Seems
to be based on a lie and a huge manipulation.
If you Who Have Read these articles, think we are Manipulating, help spread esta information, come from this blog or the like.
We can not allow them to play with us as if we where mere puppets ...
But in this particular article we will focus on analyzing the suspected role of mass media in all matters relating to these attacks, something that many alternative internet media have echoed.Accompanying and complementing this article, we have written another entitled COLLECTION OF SUSPECTS ASPECTS IN THE ATTACKS OF PARIS , where we met many of the contradictory information media mass conceal the matter or have gone unnoticed for most of the people.
In the end, the media has made us talk about three terrorists in total, but as we shall see has become a confused and the matter has left a series of extremely suspicious information gaps, as we will show later.To begin, let's focus on the news offered by the media during the first hours, full of contradictions and misunderstandings.For example, the night of Wednesday January 7 to January 8, several Spanish radio announced that the terrorists had been cornered in an apartment in Reims and they were surrounded by police.The terrorist bombing of Charlie Hebdo, cornered in the city of ReimsThe French newspaper Le Point anticipates an exclusive in which notes that the French police prepare an imminent operation in the city of Reims northeast of Paris "
The news, as we had presented some means disappeared and reproduced the next day, saying that this time had been herded into another home in Oise."The Kuachi Said Cherif and brothers were seen this morning at a gas station near the town of Villers-Cotterets, in Aisne, which would have stolen fuel and food. Subsequently, the chain Picardie France 3 reported that they had abandoned their vehicle, a gray Clio, and had barricaded themselves in a house in the town of Crépy-en-Valois, in Oise.However, this information has not been confirmed and even the mayor of the town, Bruno Fortier, has told Reuters that helicopters were flying over the town and had been deployed police and anti-terrorist forces."It's an endless waltz of police cars and trucks," he told Reuters the mayor, who said he could not confirm the information on the presence of the suspects in a house in the area.Several French media reports of a heavy police presence in another town of Aisne. According to Le Figaro, has cut a local road to the town of Longpont and would be making records in several homes in the nearby town of Corcy "Finally, after these two previous or rather, bad and hasty interpretations of facts false rumors, the brothers themselves were rounded; this time in a print shop in the town of Dammartin-en-Gode, following the same pattern characterized news headline "2 suspects rounded up by the police" who had repeated to above.Meanwhile, US media senior, also contributed to the confusion.An example of the level of confidence we should have all to the information provided by the mass media is found in the following article published by a chain of American prestige, nothing more and nothing less than NBC.
This is what I came to say NBC on January 7:"NEWSFLASH: one of the suspects in the attack of Paris has been killed and two others have been arrested, officials of the United States"Zerohedge As the site says:"How this false rumor spread, becoming featured in a newscast certain prestige?According to NBC, "This morning, two senior US counterterrorism officials told NBC News that one of the suspects in the attack had died and two others were in custody. However, officials said later that the information could not be confirmed "It is somewhat curious that the mainstream media, led by "the best communications professionals characterized by their credibility," do not stop making mistakes and inaccuracies and again, some of them very serious, no one would take in face or being accused of "contributing to confusion or chaos."However, any alternative means of Internet is qualified forger or conspiranoico for much less, with the difference that the alternative media do not receive government assistance or succulents are considered the "universal bearers of truth".
ACCUSED OF ATTACK THE ALLEGED BROTHER IN LAW WITHOUT PROOF OF IT"Efficient" French security services and obedient spokesmen for the media had no qualms about publicly accuse the attack on a person who had no relation to the facts, in the early hours ..."Another man who at first was identified as another possible major perpetrators of the attack was delivered tonight. It is Mourda Hamyd, who came to 23.00 to the police station in Charleville-Mezieres, near the border with Belgium. Hamyd, 18, appeared voluntarily after seeing its circular on social networks name. To the agents, the young has proclaimed his innocence, which raises questions about their real involvement in the crimes. So far, no charges have been filed against him.A fellow Hamyd has told the media that the young Gauls was not in Paris at the time of the attack because she was with him at the high school of Reims, where he enrolled last year. "He's like the other fellow, friendly and not at all violent. He is someone you can talk and joke, "said the student on condition of anonymity.According to the newspaper 'Libération', the Mourda own Kouachi Chérif Saïd and be part of an organized command. In this line, Manuel Valls said that "services (secrets) were known and therefore followed them". 'Le Monde' goes further and says that it is a "family" cell, since Mourad has the same name as the woman Cherif, suggesting that family ties among the three "Here we must ask yourself some questions: whether as indicated by the media and the authorities, Mourda Hamyd was a dangerous Islamic terrorist who was part of a "family unit" ... why he voluntarily surrendered to the police? That's typical of a dangerous Islamist terrorist?Not an act of irresponsibility on the part of the media and the authorities accuse someone of something so extremely grave without conclusive evidence of this?Can we tolerate the media act so irresponsibly?Can anyone imagine what would have happened to Mourda Hamyd if afraid to be accused by the media, had made the mistake of trying to escape?And if he had been killed by the police in their flight, Anybody can imagine what we would have said the media themselves about it?Do we would have said he was innocent and it was all a mistake or have argued that the attacks had helped even without evidence of this and that's why he fled?We leave the answer to imagination of readers.But as we shall see, the issue of Mourda Hamyd could have been one of the aspects that have most influenced when creating confusion to the point of leaving several questions in the air ...
THE GREAT MYSTERY HOW MANY MEN ATTACKED THE EDITOR OF THE JOURNAL Charlie Hebdo?This is undoubtedly one of the most confusing aspects of the attacks in Paris, although no one speaks it.This confusion is due mainly to the lack of specificity of the information provided by the media.The key question is how many men attacked the offices of Charlie Hebdo? Were were two or three?As we've seen published in the media, were initially three men and with the passing of time, one of them "volatilized" ending up being just two assailants.Here are a set of news excerpts chosen at random from internet, which clearly reflect the level of confusion and contradiction which can fall mainstream media ...France: attacking shots headquarters of the weekly "Charlie Hebdo" and there are 12 deadThree masked men broke on Wednesday at the offices of Charlie Hebdo, killing a dozen people before fleeing, police and witnesses.
At least two of the three authors of the attack penetrated shot at midmorning in drafting the satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo progressive and killed at close range to 12 people, mostly members of the editorial ...The three suspects identified by police last night are Said K. and K. Cherif, brothers of 34 and 32 years respectively, and Hamyd M., 18. The three men are French nationals.(Once ruled Hamyd, the third suspect is volatilized and NOBODY SAYS NOTHING)The slaughter occurred at noon in the eleventh arrondissement, when two masked men dressed in black, have entered the offices of the magazine armed with Kalashnikov rifles and have fired staff. According to the government, the police are looking for a total of "three criminals" across the capital.Police finishes with the two terrorists who attacked the magazine Charlie HebdoKouachi The two brothers suspected of the attack, had entrenched themselves in the press this morning north of Paris with at least one hostage, who has unhurt.Several rounds of automatic gunfire, accompanied by loud explosions have occurred shortly before 17:00 at the press of a town northeast of Paris where were entrenched since this morning the two perpetrators of the attack on the headquarters Charlie Hebdo, who died in the assault.
THE EMERGENCE OF Amedy COULIBALYThe subsequent emergence of a third terrorist allegedly coordinated with the two Kouachi, Amedy Coulibaly brothers, further contributes to the confusion.Supposedly, Coulibaly was responsible for the murder of an officer of the municipal police on Wednesday January 7, hours after the attack on Charlie Hebdo and then kidnapped a Jewish supermarket.
But we can guess at the following chronic, did not participate in the attack on Charlie Hebdo ...The brothers were Kouachi Al Qaida, his accomplice Coulibaly was the Islamic StateThe author of the kidnapping of Jewish Store acknowledged being linked to the perpetrators of the slaughter in 'Charlie Hebdo'Amedy Coulibaly, the abductor of Jewish food store in Paris, is the author of the death of one agent Municipal Police on Thursday and is, in turn, accomplice of the Kouachi brothers, responsible for the massacre of the satirical weekly "Charlie Hebdo ".
Yesterday appeared on social networks video from Amedy Coulibaly, the attacker Jewish super that killed a policeman and four hostages, which proclaimed their loyalty to the leader of the Islamic State. He says he and Said and Cherif Kouachi brothers formed a "team" that were synchronized. "They were in charge of the weekly 'Charlie Hebdo' and police. We have made a little apart, to have more impact things a little together, "he says.
They coordinated their actions temporarily to cause greater impact, but were not together, because not only obeyed the orders of the same organizations.We have since learned two things about Coulibaly.1- He met with Sarkozy:"Amedi Coulibaly, The Alleged perpetrator of the death yesterday of a police force in Montrouge and was killed Friday in a Jewish shop in Paris, after the assault to the police, met in 2009 With Nicolas Sarkozy. It was a then a Meeting with President With several young temporary Contracts, in order to be interested in the working conditions of French employees.One at that time, Coulibaly was shown overwhelmed at the Meeting with Sarkozy in an interview published in the newspaper "Le Parisien". "It's a pleasure. I do not know what can I say ... I'll start with a "good morning "" commented "
2- The French security services Knew Their terrorist linksCoulibaly was Sentenced in December 2013 to five years in prison for trying to help him escape the Islamist Smaïn Ait Belkacem, a former member of the Armed Islamic Group (GIA) Algerian WHO carried interest out an attack on the train the Musée d'Orsay in Paris in 1995, with 30 wounded.But curiously, esta Known and dangerous terrorist, Convicted and monitored by the security services HAD During three days time to do Everything That flesh pleased.
After the attack Kouachi brothers Charlie Hebdo, a municipal agent killed in Montrouge, managed to flee the scene, Went home and HAD time to record a video (changing clothes up to 4 times), Which established STI coordination Where reivindaba With them and what " was going to do ", ie, kidnap Jewish supermarket Where I Allegedly killed four people. Then I left His house, armed to the teeth and quietly Went to the supermarket to make a kidnapping.Menudos intelligence, right?And MOST That is always suspicious, in Original terrorists, leaving Numerous previous trail in networks and in the media world, as was the case with man Haron Monis, the kidnapper Sidney Coffee ...
CONCLUSION ON THE three assailantsThe finding arrived midst of so much confusion and vagueness media Is That a terrorist is gone .The question is: WHERE IS THE THIRD MUGGER A Charlie Hebdo JOURNAL OF TALKING SOME LIGHTS?WHY NOBODY TALKS ABOUT IT?WHY YOU HAVE FORGOTTEN THE MEDIA?HAVE YOU volatilized?It Seems That the confusion lies in the following respec ...Initially 3 people accused of the attack on Charlie Hebdo magazine: Kouachi the two brothers and the alleged brother of one of them, Mourda Hamyd. Some witnesses corroborate that actually "saw 3 people."That should be the starting point.But to voluntarily surrender Mourda Hamyd a curator of northern France and prove his innocence by removing the initial theory according to which part of the group of three attackers, the figure of the third suspect disappears from the scene, as if it never existed, even though hours before, witnesses and media themselves speak of him.That's when the media start talking about "two attackers Charlie Hebdo"
Later, after the appropriate video of claim Coulibaly, the media claim that the brothers and Coulibaly were "complicit" and acted "coordinated" without specifying in any way how or why.Thus, in the public mind, is covered "vacancy" the third suspect seen in the assault on the headquarters of Charlie Hebdo, which people unconsciously identified as Coulibaly, despite the very means of communication, diffuse and nothing clear, separate actions Coulibaly of the Kouachi brothers.As always, a fantastic role of mass media, as we see, only serve to confuse, throw messages parroting propaganda and information from our partners and governments without contrasting.Agents pure disinformation.That's what they call "journalism".
THE LIE OF POLICE INSISTENT EXECUTED WITH A SHOT IN THE HEADA clear example of the ability to confuse and misinform the media we have in the most infamous and shocking image of this attack, used to highlight the brutality of terrorists: the cold-blooded execution of Police Ahmed Merabet.Insistently, the official media have insisted that the police was being run shot in the head, a claim that has caused a huge controversy in some alternative media, reaching raise doubts about the possibility that we to find a false dramatization of an execution.The main focus of confusion stems from the statement "executed with a shot to the head."As we can see in the video below, this statement does not seem too sustainable, because according to many experts, shot in the head with an AK-47, would have caused the victim's head literally exploded.An example of the damage caused by an AK-47 can see in the video below:On the other hand, in the video content on the web following, offered the image (not for sensitive souls) of execution in slow motion, show us what (supposedly and according to some alternative media) would be a shot deliberately failed, which could be inferred by bouncing the ball on the sidewalk:However, one can not argue categorically that all this question of an assembly.There is the possibility that the victim was actually executed, but without being shot in the head, as stated by the middle Daily Sheeple:"That's not a head shot! The bullet entered the bulletproof vest at the top of the shoulder to walk out the front. The small dust explosion we see is the steel core ammunition hitting the sidewalk. Blood spills caused by injury, would be contained by the body armor at the front. What is indisputable is that there has not been a headshot. A bullet from 126 grams to 700 meters per second, if hit in the head, would have exploded like a melon "Obviously, we are not experts in ballistics or weapons (or expect to have to be), but at this point do not need to have much knowledge of the subject to see, quite clearly, that the victim was shot in the head; otherwise, the images are much tougher.The big question is: if lots of people have been able to deduce something as obvious as this, why does the media continue to insist that he was executed with a bullet in his head? Did journalists can not minimally investigated before as inaccurate statements? Why should we believe them if they do not even care to tell the truth about something so obvious?
THE NEW ROLE OF MEDIA IN THE ACTS OF TERRORISMOne issue that is most striking about the attack of Paris, is the new role of the media.Not only do we offer live terrorist attacks as if it were a spectacle more, they are now able to interview the terrorists themselves while doing the attacks, further contributing to convert the attacks in a great TV show.As stated in The World:"We synchronize operations". This forceful the kidnapper Amedy Coulibaly said while retaining several hostages today Hyper Cacher, a Jewish supermarket in Paris. Before being killed by police during the assault on kosher food store where entrenched, Coulibaly called the French television BFMTV to make his intentions clear.BFMTV also spoke this morning with one of the attackers 'Charlie Hebdo' Kouachi Cherif, who remained ensconced in an industrial building in Dammartin-en-Goële. He said he and his brother "were the defenders of the Prophet" and was "under the command of Al Qaeda in Yemen", where he had traveled to receive training.As explained from this medium have been Cherif Kouachi who answered the phone when an editor called chain directly to the printer in which jihadists remained entrenched. "We were trying to find a witness," explained an editor of BFMTV. Apparently there were two calls, the second of which was recorded by television and sent to the policeThis fact opens a new path in the field of television broadcasting.Probably from now, we can "enjoy" dramatic live calls during the attacks, thereby increasing the level of spectacle and morbidity of the events described.A new route for the media with propaganda to offer doses to the population and increase the dose of emotional impact, show and morbidity of any tragedy or violent act in the future is as open.And with it, the ability to manipulate the emotions of the people at the whim of the writers of the system.
AN EXAMPLE OF SUBTLE SOCIAL CONDITIONINGBefore closing, we want to add one more detail that speaks very clearly, the level of manipulation to which we are subject, especially from the media.Everything revolves around the use of mobile and detail that may seem merely anecdotal.And, apparently, Amedy Coulibaly, 32 years old, it tasted like a mobile phone is switched off.
It seems that Coulibaly is the only person of his age who can not turn off the phone. The media has told us that after calling the television, Coulibaly "hung wrong mobile phone" and still could hear what was happening inside the supermarket.That was how the police could know the movements of Coulibaly and found the best time for the assault.
Similarly, hidden in a cardboard box worker could tell the police movements Kouachi brothers in the press in which they had dug, giving valuable information to the security forces for the assault.In both cases, the technology combines the side of "good" and the fact offers two subliminal images of "high value".The first subliminal message is: policing, listening to what happened on the other side of the phone, saves lives, as in the case of Coulibaly and assault the Jewish supermarket.The second subliminal message is: someone sneaking goat movements "evil", helps to stop them, as in the case of hiding in the box printing worker.
The funny thing That is the main abitur to report Such activities will be mainly With Public Officials Whose job and Their livelihood depends THEREFORE Directly from the Authorities.What will happen if any of These Officials refuse to exercise informer?If one day a young jihadist Man Who goes to school, for instance, Makes an attack and Their teachers or social services did not detect Their activities, Can They Fall acerca them Suspicions That did not Fulfill Their obligation or collaborated Directly With Him default?Eventually Perhaps it can not make a big pressure for groups in Original, That conditional on overact, denouncing suspicious activity more real?Do you begin to see the level of public paranoia That can lead us all this and the serious it May Have Consequences for our freedoms?
CONCLUSIONAfter all this show of confusion, conflicting reports, half-truths, omissions Timely and Widespread manipulation, it really Becomes Difficult To have any confidence in the information provided by the mass media.It is possible That With The passing hours or days, some of the Contradictions of the Means shown in artículo are clarified.It is a possibility.But what no one can argue it's the blatant failure of mainstream media telling the truth When Cleary and reliably.The only way to keep trusting in them, is to close our eyes to the evidence and ignore Their constant inconsistencies and falsehoods ...Why MOST people still refuse to see something so obvious?Are you going to continue believing the lies that you 'Told in the mass media, on television, in newspapers or large radio?The Consequences of These CAN HAVE attacks on the lives of Thousands, if not millions of people can be extremely serious and everything Seems to be based on a lie and a huge manipulation.If you Who Have Read these articles, think we are Manipulating, help spread esta information, come from this blog or the like.We can not allow them to play with us as if we where mere puppets ...
No comments:
Post a Comment